Lukas Marsoun vs Charles Broom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marsoun vs Broom analysis and find out who is favored!
Lukas Marsoun vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Marsoun 1 - 0 Broom
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marsoun has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Broom has won 52.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marsoun, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Broom has won 56.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marsoun has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broom has saved 64.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marsoun has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Broom winning 60.98% (W/L 50/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marsoun has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 44/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marsoun winning 1 times and Broom being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Marsoun winning 2 and Broom winning 0. The last match between Marsoun and Broom was at the Germany F11, 10-08-2015, Q2 round, Clay with Lukas Marsoun getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marsoun and Broom have played a deciding set 0 times, with Marsoun winning 0 times and Broom 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marsoun winning 0, and Broom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marsoun has played against opponents with an average rank of while Broom has played against players with an average rank of 218.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marsoun has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broom has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marsoun has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broom has converted 37.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
872
High
38
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
284
Rank
284
High
26
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
48% (54-59)
Career Total W/L
63% (206-119)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
62% (21-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$36,000
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Lukas Marsoun | Charles Broom |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Lukas Marsoun | Charles Broom |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (21/13) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (48/34) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (409/373) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (14/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.55 |
Aces Total | 0 | 211 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
DFs Total | 0 | 85 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 200.59 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (1562/2430) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (1102/1562) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (455/868) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (103/274) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (1069/2627) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 46% (6/7) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (15/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (21/34) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/11) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/14) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 84% (19/16) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 16% (19/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (15/5) |
Lukas Marsoun Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-2 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Pre-Q | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Daniil Glinka
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Charles Broom
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Charles Broom
Player
Henry Searle
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Charles Broom
Player
Robert Strombachs
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Charles Broom
Player
Alexis Canter
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Charles Broom
Player
Alex Knaff
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more